QRZ! Ham Radio 3/QRZ Ham Radio Callsign Database - Volume 3.iso/digests/infoham/931326.txt

Internet Message Format | 1994-06-04 | 26KB

Date: Mon,  8 Nov 93 22:01:39 PST
From: Info-Hams Mailing List and Newsgroup <[e-mail]>
Errors-To: [e-mail]
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Precedence: Bulk
Subject: Info-Hams Digest V93 #1326
To: Info-Hams


Info-Hams Digest            Mon,  8 Nov 93       Volume 93 : Issue 1326

Today's Topics:
                        ARRL files to ftp..???
                        BAUD VS BAUDS (2 msgs)
                  Care and Feeding LARGE Gel-Cells?
                       characteristic impedance
        Daily Solar Geophysical Data Broadcast for 08 November
                       EU DX rtty TST questions
                     Help! connect my HT to Amp
                        HELP!  Mirage B108 Amp
                 How does an American sign in Canada?
                  Is the band dead -- or nbobody on?
               MPT/Buendelfunk in DE/Mobile Priv.Radio
                    Opinions on the Alinco DR-600T
                          Slowpokes (2 msgs)
                       TS-50s Computer Control

Send Replies or notes for publication to: <[e-mail]>
Send subscription requests to: <[e-mail]>
Problems you can't solve otherwise to [e-mail].

Archives of past issues of the Info-Hams Digest are available
(by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/info-hams".

We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party.  Your mileage may vary.  So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: 8 Nov 93 08:39:22 EST
From: psinntp![e-mail]
Subject: ARRL files to ftp..???
To: [e-mail]

In rec.radio.amateur.misc, [e-mail]
(Scott Ehrlich) writes:

>You can anonymously log into world.std.com (192.74.137.5) and change
>directory to: /pub/hamradio/arrl/Server-files

>where you will find ALL of the ARRL files from their info server.

And the keepers of the INFO server sure do appreciate it! Thanks.

The original poster was talking about our land-line bulletin
board. Those files are separate from the ones the Lab maintains
on INFO.

We do have a few of the files from the BBS but I have kept that
to a minimum because every time I checked the BBS files I realized
that they had been updated and we had old copies.

73 from ARRL HQ, Ed

-----
Ed Hare, KA1CV                  [e-mail]
American Radio Relay League
225 Main St.
Newington, CT  06111            If you tie a strip of colored cloth to
[phone] - voice          part of your body, the tribe acts
ARRL Laboratory Supervisor      differently!
RFI, xmtr and rcvr testing
-----

------------------------------

Date: 8 Nov 93 16:18:47 GMT
From: ogicse!emory!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!library.ucla.edu!nntp.ucsb.edu!network.ucsd.edu![e-mail]
Subject: BAUD VS BAUDS
To: [e-mail]

Ken Smith ([e-mail]) writes:

>Doesn't BAUD fall into the category of words like DATA? It remains the
>same.

>Ken


Ummm ... not really. DATA is a plural already, the singular being
DATUM. According to my Concise Oxford Dictionary, there is no
distinction between the singular and plural of BAUD. There's no
such thing as "bauds" in there either.
   Cheers,
   Simon.

=================================================================
   _   _    Simon Woodworth           | Tel:  [phone] x258
 _/ \_/ \_  Motorola Ireland Ltd.     | Fax:  [phone]
/ \_/ \_/ \ European Cellular         |--------------------------
\_/ \_/ \_/ Infrastructure Division   |   uunet!motcid!glas!woods
            Blackrock, Cork, Ireland. |   [e-mail]
=================================================================

------------------------------

Date: 8 Nov 93 10:51:00 EST
From: psinntp![e-mail]
Subject: Baud vs Bauds
To: [e-mail]

In rec.radio.amateur.misc, [e-mail] (Cecil A Moore) writes:
>
>Text item: Text_1
>
>>As a friend recently pointed out to me, saying "1200 bauds" is very much
>>like saying "1200 Hertzes".  Both units have identical singular and
>>plural forms -- it's not right to add an "s" to either.
>>Stephen Trier  KB8PWA
>
>Here's a generic observation. At least half of the discussions, like
>this one, that go on and on and on... never need to have started in
>the first place if one would just consult the dictionary (and/or the
>ARRL Handbook). I previously posted that the dictionary lists baud as
>the first choice for the plural of baud and lists bauds as the second
>choice. In that respect, it is like the word, fish, where fish is the
>first choice for plural with fishes being the second choice.

Yup.  And "first choice" and "second choice" don't mean one is more
correct than the other.  Either is correct.  Webster's Ninth
Collegiate says: pl _baud_ also _bauds_.  And, on page 11 of the
dictionary, it says:

   When another spelling is joined to the main entry by the word *also*,
   the spelling after *also* is a secondary variant and occurs less
   frequently than the first...
   Secondary variants belong to standard usage and may be used according
   to personal inclination.

So, use whichever form you like.
------
Jon Bloom, KE3Z                   | [e-mail]
American Radio Relay League       |
225 Main St., Newington CT 06111  |

------------------------------

Date: 9 Nov 93 03:03:02 GMT
From: ogicse!emory!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!noc.near.net!news.delphi.com![e-mail]
Subject: Care and Feeding LARGE Gel-Cells?
To: [e-mail]

Somewhat along the same lines. . .

I purchase two Panasonic LCR12V2.2P lead-acid batteries for use with the
HTX-202. These are fairly nice 2.2 amp/hour batteries that are about the same
size as my HTX-202. I've used these batteries for hours on end without
having to recharge them -- much better than the stock NiCds. The only
"problem" I've run into so far is charging them. I have a small lead-acid
charger of the type you can get in the Automotive departments at Wal-Mart,
K-Mart, Target, etc. that is settable between 2A/6A charging rates. So far
this charger seems to be working well but it's a manual type and I'm not
sure how long I should charge the batteries. What I've been doing is letting
the battery drop to about 10 to 10.5 volts then throwing it on the charger
and checking it every 30 minutes to an hour with a DMM. When the battery
voltage increases to about 12 volts, I remove them from the charger and
put them back in the carrying case.

One thing is absolutely accurate: I could use some tips on charging lead-acid
batteries. The particular ones I have are stamped "Constant Voltage Charge"
with the ratings "cycle use: 14.6-15.0V and standby use: 13.6-13.8V." Inital
charge current is rated at 0.88A.

 -- Greg KE4DPX

------------------------------

Date: 8 Nov 93 22:50:42 GMT
From: ogicse!emory!kd4nc!ke4zv![e-mail]
Subject: characteristic impedance
To: [e-mail]

In article <9311081152.AA32868@swmis> [e-mail] writes:
>
>No-one has yet pointed out that you can 'measure' it directly! No need for
>anything electrical, electronic or radio.
>
>The characteristic impedance of a line is given by the formula
>
> Zo = 138Log (d2/d1)
>
>where d2/d1 is the ratio of the respective diameters of the inner and outer
>elements of the line.
>If the line has a solid center conductor, its easy! Get out your vernier
>callipers or micrometer, and a scientific calculator (or log-tables for
>oldtimers).  Multi-stranded center conductors may need some extra
>trigonometry; measure the thickness of one strand, count the number of
>strands, work out the mean diameter..... or isnt this sort of thing taught
>in math classes these days?

That formula will work for *air dielectric* lines, but isn't correct
for the more common cables with solid dielectrics of various values.
There's no easy way to determine the dielectric constant of a cable
by simple inspection.

You can attempt to measure the inductance and  capacitance per unit
length and apply the formula

Zo=sqrt(L/C)

Gary

--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |"If 10% is good enough | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems | for Jesus, it's good  | uunet!rsiatl!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             | enough for Uncle Sam."| emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     | -Ray Stevens          |

------------------------------

Date: 9 Nov 93 04:05:15 GMT
From: [e-mail]
Subject: Daily Solar Geophysical Data Broadcast for 08 November
To: [e-mail]

!!BEGIN!! (1.0) S.T.D. Solar Geophysical Data Broadcast for DAY 312, 11/08/93
10.7 FLUX=091.9  90-AVG=094        SSN=042      BKI=4323 2333  BAI=014
BGND-XRAY=A6.2     FLU1=1.9E+06  FLU10=1.1E+04  PKI=4333 3432  PAI=014
  BOU-DEV=042,026,018,034,010,021,029,022   DEV-AVG=025 NT     SWF=00:000
 XRAY-MAX= B5.7   @ 2205UT    XRAY-MIN= A3.0   @ 0027UT   XRAY-AVG= A9.9
NEUTN-MAX= +002%  @ 2035UT   NEUTN-MIN= -002%  @ 0810UT  NEUTN-AVG= +0.3%
  PCA-MAX= +0.0DB @ 2355UT     PCA-MIN= -0.3DB @ 1635UT    PCA-AVG= -0.0DB
BOUTF-MAX=55372NT @ 0242UT   BOUTF-MIN=55330NT @ 1914UT  BOUTF-AVG=55354NT
GOES7-MAX=P:+000NT@ 0000UT   GOES7-MIN=N:+000NT@ 0000UT  G7-AVG=+064,+000,+000
GOES6-MAX=P:+109NT@ 2033UT   GOES6-MIN=N:-072NT@ 1033UT  G6-AVG=+085,+019,-041
 FLUXFCST=STD:095,090,090;SESC:095,090,090 BAI/PAI-FCST=010,005,005/012,010,010
    KFCST=1114 4000 0004 4000  27DAY-AP=015,013   27DAY-KP=4443 3322 3443 2222
 WARNINGS=
   ALERTS=**245STRM:0000-2359UTC
!!END-DATA!!

NOTE: The Effective Sunspot Number for 07 NOV 93 was  34.9.
      The Full Kp Indices for 07 NOV 93 are: 4o 2o 4o 3+   3+ 3+ 3o 4o

------------------------------

Date: 9 Nov 93 03:45:26 GMT
From: ogicse!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu![e-mail]
Subject: EU DX rtty TST questions
To: [e-mail]

A couple members of the local club want to give this contest a try.
I read the rules briefly in QST and the exchange information is certainly
different from any contest I have done (read field day.)  We'll probably
use a terminal and separate logging pc.  Is there any software which handles
the "unique" scoring stuff for this contest?

I suppose we could do the loggin by hand since we probably won't make that
many contacts, but then whats the point of all this modern technology?? ;-)

Just wondering...
Drew Arnett [e-mail]
club station -> W9YH

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1993 11:04:51 GMT
From: sdd.hp.com!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!hp9000.csc.cuhk.hk!uxmail!uxmail.ust.hk![e-mail]
Subject: Help! connect my HT to Amp
To: [e-mail]

Dear All hams,

 I got problem in connect my HT to Linear Amp.

equipments:
- Diameter 2 meter VSWR meter
- Stardard C160 (6v batteries)
- Yaesu FT-411 (borrow from my friend) (7.2 batteries)
- Daiwa 80 Watt Linear Amp
- Car 12 volt lead acid battery
- Diameter 2 meter Vertical Aerial X-50 (max 200 watt, with 4.5db in 2 meter)

Connection:

 HT--( a 1 feet cable)--Linear AMP---(Meter)---(10 meter cable)---Aerial


 I have connected my friend's Yaesu FT-411 to the Amp. It work very good.
and hit most repeaters with very clear signal.

 However, when I tried to connect my C160 to the amp,the "on air" led
hold after I release the PTT. The signal that receive also very good.
It did not happen in my friend's FT-411.

 Why the Amp continue to transmit after PTT released ? Why don't happen
in the FT-411 ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  Lo Ho Fung Michael                  |   == Internet e-mail address ==   |
|  Department of                       | University  :  [e-mail] |
|  Electrical & Electronic Engineering | My host  : [e-mail] |
|  The Hong Kong University            | Radio Call Sign : VR2YJR at       |
|  of Science & Technology             | VS6KP  repeater : 145.650 MHz (-) |
|  Major : Computer Engineering        | VS6HKA repeater : 145.750 MHz (-) |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------

Date: 8 Nov 1993 14:21:20 GMT
From: saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!caen!destroyer!news1.oakland.edu!vela.acs.oakland.edu![e-mail]
Subject: HELP!  Mirage B108 Amp
To: [e-mail]

H E L P ! ! !

I managed to pop the pre-amp in my Mirage B-108.  Do any of you folks
know of a replacement?  Mine does not have any markings on it and Mirage
is out of business.

73 paul wb8zjl [phone]

p.s.  I do not have a manual for this amp!  I'd really Really REALLY
like a photocopy.

------------------------------

Date: 8 Nov 1993 15:06:08 GMT
From: news.univie.ac.@!rani.arz.oeaw.ac.@!lezvax.arz.oeaw.ac.@![e-mail]
Subject: How does an American sign in Canada?
To: [e-mail]

[e-mail] (P.Bennett) writes:

>In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Peter Laws) writes...
>>So:
>>
>>Can the US government force US citizens to obey US laws while they are not
>>in the US?
>>
>>Even when those laws conflict/differ from the foreign country's laws?
>>
That is not true in general: US companies (and with them citizens) have to
comply with US laws abroad!
>No. But the forgien country can make such requirements.

In such a case very often (e.g. in agricultural policy)
 the foreign country is forced ( and therefore US citizens).

>I believe _Canada_ (not the US) requires that US amateurs comply with their
>(US) band limits, as well as the Canadian limits, while in Canada.
 In such a case very often (e.g. in agricultural policy)
 the foreign country is forced ( and therefore US citizens).
>I recall some time ago that there was some action to have the DOC adjust the
>rules so that Europeans could use 146 - 148 MHz in Canada, although they would
>not be able to use that part of 2 metres at home.

[e-mail]

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1993 13:45:29 GMT
From: pacbell.com!att-out!cbnewst![e-mail]
Subject: Is the band dead -- or nbobody on?
To: [e-mail]

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail]
(Scott Turner) writes


>>   Sometimes I really wonder if the bands are *really* dead.   Maybe everyone
>>   is listening and nobody is transmitting ;-)
>
>While others have offered logical explainations for localized band
>openings, I'll also validate Pete's closing statement.  I've not been at
>this for very long, and certainly haven't figured out the wonders of
>propogation, but sometimes it does seem that everyone is just listening.
              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  In my expereince, this is very much true of 10M.  One can tune the band
  and find no, or very few, signals.  Even when the band is obviously
  open, one may find very few signals.  As an example, I worked two different
  stations on Pitcairn this last weekend and the weekend before.  During
  the CQ contest, lots of activity on 10M.  This weekend, not many signals,
  even when the band was open.

  Of course, I usually listen  up and down the band for signals, rarely
  calling CQ.  I think many folks do the same.  If you think 10M is dead,
  try CQ a few times.  You might be surprised.
>
>On numerous occasions I've gone up to 15 meters when it seems
>absolutely dead, tuned around looking for anything interesting and
>finally called CQ just before giving up, only to have several booming
>signals answering my call.  When all else fails, don't be afraid to call
>CQ on a "dead" band.  Sure the only thing you're reaching might be your
>neighbor's TV :-) but it never hurts to try.
>
>
>Scott Turner  N0VRF  [e-mail]



73,

John, WB9VGJ

################################################################
# John L. Broughton      snail mail: Room 1K-324               #
# AT&T                               1200 E. Warrenville Rd.   #
#                                    P.O. Box 3045             #
#                                    Naperville, IL 60566-7045 #
#                                    [phone]            #
#                            e-mail: [e-mail]  #
#                                    att!john.l.broughton      #
#                air mail (HF, VHF): WB9VGJ                    #
################################################################

------------------------------

Date: 8 Nov 1993 14:51:51 GMT
From: elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!news.univie.ac.@!rani.arz.oeaw.ac.@!lezvax.arz.oeaw.ac.@![e-mail]
Subject: MPT/Buendelfunk in DE/Mobile Priv.Radio
To: [e-mail]

I am looking for service providers of Buendlefunk systems in Germany
other than the Chekker service of Telekom.
(Buendelfunk, a kind of Mobile Private/Personal Radio is a MPT service where
several users share the same channels to do mostly halfduplex communication
of limited duration. Its a kind of trunked wireless service).
As far as I know there are
Preussag Buendlefunk, Salzgitter
Primus, Darmstadt,
Quickfunk, Villingen
Regiokom, Berlin
What are the technologies to be used? Is all of it MPT 1327/1343

Where do I get information on MPT? Is something available on the net?
But any pointer to literature or addresses is welcome.

I know the following technology providers:
AEG Mobile communications
Bosch, Mobile Communications
Surely there are others? I guess many telecom companies have a solution?

What are prices of customer equipment and service in your country?
What are the comparative (dis-)advantages of this
cordless service against PCN system like DCS1800, DECT, CT2/Telepoint.

Which service providers are there in other countries?
Does anybody know about implementations in Swizzerland?

Excuse the somewhat unordered question list.

Peter Sint
[e-mail]
Socio Economics, OEAW
Kegelgasse 27
 A-1030 Wien
tel [phone], fax -30


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1993 17:59:17 GMT
From: news.cerf.net!pagesat!olivea!charnel!yeshua.marcam.com!news.kei.com!eff!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsrelay.iastate.edu!news.iastate.edu!bwehr@network.
Subject: Opinions on the Alinco DR-600T
To: [e-mail]

I would like to know any opinions on the Alinco DR-600T.  i like to full
remote capabilities and all, but what are the pro and cons about the radio.
Please E-Mail any responses.  Thanks.


-Brant


_______________________________________   |  _________________________________
                                          |
 Brant Wehr N0UTT                      ___|
                                      | ##|
 internet [e-mail]           | C |
                                      | A |
 Activities Director  CARC            | R |
                                      | C |
 Electrical Engineering               |___|
______________________________________________________________________________

--
Brant
[e-mail]

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 08 Nov 1993 16:42:17 GMT
From: news.bbn.com!petra!zds-oem![e-mail]
Subject: Slowpokes
To: [e-mail]

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Clay Jackson) writes:
>Derek Wills ([e-mail]) wrote:
>: [e-mail] (Alan Bloom) says:
>
>:   comes back with their call and QRZ? again.   Ack.  Of course, if you
>:   listen a bit before calling, you know the rhythm of the DX op, and if
>:   you have a long call and send it slowly, the best thing to do is turn
>:   off the radio and study to upgrade...
>
>Yeah, right - I can't think of a better way to persuade those of us who ARE
>trying to upgrade how nice and friendly our fellow hams can be.  No wonder
>most of the growth is in the "no-code".
>


I don't think it was meant to be unfriendly.  Not all DX stations are
running 30 WPM and making 3 contacts a minute.  There are penty of new
hams in DX locationsthat are in the same boat as new hams here struggling
with operating procedures and code speed.

The point is you can't expect to work a Bouvet or Peter 1 dxpedition until
you have developed the skills required to do it.  There will be plenty of
operators with excellent skill that miss out on a dxpedition like that.
Run with the little dogs for awhile and develop the correct techniques,
before you know it you'll be elbowing it out with the wolf pack in the pileups.

The Novice license used to be kind of like a bunny slope at a ski hill.  It
gave you a chance to operate with others at your skill level so that you
would be ready for what goes on in the other parts of the band.  It is too
bad that so many hams are skipping over this and missing out on a valuable
part of their training.

Earl Morse
KZ8E
[e-mail]


------------------------------

Date: 8 Nov 1993 18:20:06 GMT
From: sdd.hp.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!cville-srv.wam.umd.edu![e-mail]
Subject: Slowpokes
To: [e-mail]

About "Novice license" being the Bunny Slope...

I passed my Novice in November 1984.  I didn't have a radio, and no means
to get on the air.  My first QSO was in June 1986.  I had FORGOTTEN most
of the letters!  The novice bands were a fun, controlled environment where
a 45-minute QSO, in which all you got to exchange were name, QTH, RST, and
some basic info (yup, it was slow), was absolutely great.  Chase DX on
15 and 10 meters, and during the winter, go down on 40 and 80 to chase
the WAS.

If I could have done the no-code, I don't know that I would have developed
such a keen interest in the HF stuff, because 2 meter FM is SO much easier
to do - kind of an instant gratification thing.  Gee, I couldn't even get
on 10 meter phone then!

I SO anticipated getting my 13 wpm so I could plug in the microphone.  Guess
what...

  My 100 watt rig with a dipole just couldn't fish through the big pileups.
It was OK for basic ragchewing, but if somebody came in 1 kHz away, the
contact was over.  I found myself getting <<REALLY>> frustrated with SSB.
Every time I flip on the radio, and go down to the phone band, and realize
how susceptible it is to interference, even with filters, I go back to CW.
It requires skill, on BOTH ends of the contact.  It uses very little band-
width and can be filtered like mad.  Last Field Day I was running QRP with
a dipole.  On phone, I made 0 (ZERO) contacts in 2 hours of trying.  On
CW, I made about 140 in 12 hours of operating.  Rarely had to call more
than three times to get through.

  Simply put, say what you will about it, for most of us CW is a much more
reliable mode than phone when working on HF, VHF, UHF, or really anywhere
else.  SSB spreads that power out over a few kHz.  CW has a punch.  The
Novice license got me hooked - it was the only way in.

I LIKE the no-code license.  My fiancee is a no-code.  I'm just afraid, like
many others who are religious CW ops, that people who could really enjoy CW
are simply not learning it because there's DEFINITELY no instant gratifi-
cation.  None.  CW is a BITCH to learn and get good at.  I'm still not all
that good, even though I can zip along at 25 wpm.  I still make a LOT of
mistakes, especially when using the keyer, and I certainly don't copy
every single character that goes into my ears.  But I get enough to fill
in the blanks.

After 6 years of CW operating, I FINALLY started to copy words instead of
characters.  SIX YEARS of operating!

You'll have to pry my key from my cold, stiff hands,

Scott NF3I

--
73,             _________   _________  The
       \ /  Long   Original
Scott Rosenfeld  Amateur Radio NF3I  Burtonsville, MD  |   Live    $5.00
  WAC-CW/SSB  WAS  DXCC - 109 QSLed on dipoles __________| Dipoles! Antenna!

------------------------------

Date: 8 Nov 1993 13:30:51 GMT
From: spool.mu.edu!nigel.msen.com!ilium!gdls.com![e-mail]
Subject: TS-50s Computer Control
To: [e-mail]

Has anyone hooked up their TS-50s to a PC?  I'd like to hear from them.

BTW, the TS-50S takes the IF-232 plus an additional box, making it doubly expensive
to do.  Does anyone know what the extra box does?

73's

Bill

------------------------------

Date: 8 Nov 93 23:07:39 GMT
From: ogicse!emory!kd4nc!ke4zv![e-mail]
To: [e-mail]

References <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <2blvdg$[e-mail]>
Reply-To : [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject : Re: Radio Shack HTs

In article <2blvdg$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Matthew B Cravit) writes:
>In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] () writes:
>>Possible stupid question: who makes the HTX-202?
>
>I have been told that it is made by Icom, but this was by an R.S.
>salesdroid, so I could be wrong.

Well they say "Made in Korea for Tandy Corp", so I don't think Icom
is involved. I heard they were made by the same company that makes
their scanners.

Gary

--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |"If 10% is good enough | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems | for Jesus, it's good  | uunet!rsiatl!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             | enough for Uncle Sam."| emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     | -Ray Stevens          |

------------------------------

End of Info-Hams Digest V93 #1326
******************************
******************************